Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rohit Manchanda Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rohit Manchanda Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi Quashes Reassessment – Non-Service of Sec 148 Notice Factually Incorrect Reasons Render Proceedings Void In Rohit Manchanda vs ITO (AY 2012-13), the ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee’s appeal and annulled reassessment proceedings holding them void ab initio. The AO had reopened the case based on AIR information alleging non-disclosure of capital gains from property sale; however, the Tribunal found that the assessee had already filed a regular return declaring the transaction and claiming exemption u/s 54. The ITAT observed that notice u/s 148 w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930