Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sureshkumar Kasturram Purohit Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sureshkumar Kasturram Purohit Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) NRI Property Investment – Additions U/s 69 Deleted After DRP Relief – Cash Deposit & Stamp Duty Explained with Bank Evidence – ITAT Ahmedabad The assessee, a US-based NRI, faced reassessment relating to investment in a residential flat, where additions were proposed u/s 69 for unexplained investment. While DRP granted substantial relief by accepting documentary evidence for most payments, it sustained addition of ₹5.32 lakh relating to cash deposit, stamp duty and registration charges. Before ITAT, the assessee produ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void – Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition Reopening Notice Invalid Without Proper Section u/s 151 – ITAT Quashes Reassessment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031