Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vikas Vijay Gupta Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Vikas Vijay Gupta Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Procedural error in penalty proceedings can be rectified- ITAT Ahmedabad confirms validity of revision u/s 263 for wrong penalty notice

PCIT  in 263 order  held that though the AO in the body of the reassessment order concluded the unexplained amount of Rs.66,63,250/= is required to be taxed u/s.69A in line with section 115BBE   & also initiated penalty proceeding u/s.271AAC[1]   but erroneously issued penalt

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reasons First, Notice Later: Illegal Reassessment Quashed Holding Company Is in Business Even Without Operating Revenue Reasons Must Precede Section 148 Notice, Reopening Quashed Interest on Fixed Deposits Exempt When Article 289 Applies Sales Accepted, Purchases Can’t Be Bogus Under MVAT Alerts View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031