This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Hyper-technical view cannot be the basis to assume revisionary jurisdiction
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sarita Gupta Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Sarita Gupta Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Introduction: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi recently addressed a crucial case, Sarita Gupta Vs PCIT, where the revisionary order by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) was contested. The central issue revolved around the denial of deduction u/s 54/54F based on non-deposit in the capital gains scheme account.
Detailed Analysis: The appellant, a resident individual, had sold an immovable property, prompting the Assessing Officer to reopen the assessment. The ITAT Delhi observed that the capital gain amount had been d...






