Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gandaram & Sons Jewellers Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gandaram & Sons Jewellers Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Demonetisation Cash Deposits Largely Accepted: ITAT Restricts Addition to ₹2 Lakh and Disallows Section 115BBE for AY 2017-18 The Delhi ITAT partly allowed the appeal of Gandaram & Sons Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. and substantially reduced the addition made on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period. The Assessing Officer had treated ₹2.25 crore as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 out of total deposits of ₹3.71 crore, after giving credit for income declared under IDS-2016, and the CIT(A) had confirmed the ad...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930