Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhagirathi Krishnan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhagirathi Krishnan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) AO issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 15.02.2023 alleging investment of ₹70 lakh in property & trading transactions, claiming escapement > ₹50 lakh. Assessee replied same day explaining that ₹62 lakh was paid by her husband (supported by bank statements & his ROI showing income of ₹48.87L & ₹72.25L) & balance was from her past savings and gifts. She also showed losses in SBI shares & F&O. AO ignored all these and issued 148 on 25.03.2023—beyond 3 years from end of AY 2016-17—and ultimately made additions of only ₹7,25...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930