Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhagirathi Krishnan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Bhagirathi Krishnan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

AO issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 15.02.2023 alleging investment of ₹70 lakh in property & trading transactions, claiming escapement > ₹50 lakh. Assessee replied same day explaining that ₹62 lakh was paid by her husband (supported by bank statements & his ROI showing income of ₹48.87L & ₹72.25L) & balance was from her past savings and gifts. She also showed losses in SBI shares & F&O. AO ignored all these and issued 148 on 25.03.2023—beyond 3 years from end of AY 2016-17—and ultimately made addit

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 69B Addition Set Aside for Ignoring Statutory Tolerance Cooperative Credit Society 80P Claim Restored for AO Review Section 68 Addition Remanded Due to Creditor Balance Evidence Intended Industrial Use Irrelevant for Section 10(37) Exemption Penalty u/s 271B Deleted Due to Reasonable Cause for Delay View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031