Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : O.P Associates Vs PCIT (ITAT Lucknow)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
O.P Associates Vs PCIT (ITAT Lucknow) Assessee, engaged in liquor business, was selected for complete scrutiny with two specific triggers – large cash deposits during demonetization & abnormal sales with lower profits. AO issued multiple notices, obtained month-wise cash sales & deposits, compared GP/NP ratios, verified purchases through Form 26AS, examined stock, unsecured loans, creditors, rent payments, major expenses, & accepted books (audit u/s 44AB). Only ₹1 lakh was disallowed for unverifiable expenses. Later, PCIT invoked Section 263, claiming AO failed to make prop...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930