Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Hari Trust Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shri Hari Trust Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) No disallowance u/s 14A without exempt income – Even suo-moto disallowance withdrawable; additions of ₹43.23 Cr deleted – ITAT Mumbai In Shri Hari Trust vs ACIT (A.Y. 2016-17), the AO invoked section 14A r.w. Rule 8D and made total disallowance of ₹43.23 crore, including additional disallowance of ₹24.94 crore over and above assessee’s suo-moto disallowance of ₹18.28 crore. The assessee argued that no exempt income was earned during the year and the suo-moto disallowance itself was wrongly made due to incorrect advice. The ITAT accepted that ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930