Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Jainam Investments (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Jainam Investments (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance on account alleged fictitious trading loss in absence of any direct incriminating material is not sustainable. Accordingly, CIT(A) rightly deleted the disallowance and allowed the appeal of the assessee. Thus, the present appeal by revenue is dismissed. Facts- The assessee, a partnership firm, has been carrying on the business of trading in shares, derivatives and futures & options for several years. Post scrutiny assessment, AO recorded reasons to believe that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment and, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930