Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lokesh Kumar Khabya Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Lokesh Kumar Khabya Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Reopening Quashed in 6 Cases for No Addition on Recorded Reasons; Commission Estimation Rationalised to 0.40% (Sales/Purchases) & 0.50% (Loans) with Group-Entity Exclusion  These 37 connected appeals were clubbed and disposed by a common order since all assessees belonged to the Lokesh Khabya / ARC-linked group, and issues in all years revolved around (i) validity of reassessment u/s 147 & (ii) estimation of commission income for alleged accommodation entries in sales, purchases & loans. I. Six appeals fully allowed—Reopening quashed (Je...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930