Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjeev Kumar Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjeev Kumar Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Jurisdictional Overreach – CIT(A) cannot convert 271AAB into 271(1)(c)- Penalty on 153A Surrender Invalid Delhi ITAT has quashed a penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c), granting full relief to the assessee. Assessee had originally filed his return of income u/s 153A after a search, declaring an additional surrendered amount of ₹92 lakh. AO assessed the income u/s 153A/143(3) &  initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AAB in respect of the surrendered sum. Subsequently, a penalty order u/s 271AAB was passed, which was later deleted by  CIT(A). However, in a se...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930