This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Indexation Benefit Directed as CIT(A) Omitted Mandatory Section 48 Relief
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ashish Tilakchandra Bhatt Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ashish Tilakchandra Bhatt Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Indexation Mandatory & Cash Deposit Addition Restricted: Ahmedabad ITAT Grants Partial Relief
The Ahmedabad “SMC” Bench of the ITAT partly allowed the appeal of Ashish Tilakchandra Bhatt vs. DCIT, Gandhinagar, ITA No. 1503/Ahd/2025, AY 2012-13, vide order dated 18.12.2025
On the capital gains issue, the Tribunal noted that although the CIT(A) had directed the AO to recompute capital gains as per the DVO’s valuation, no explicit direction was given to allow indexation benefit u/s 48. Observing that indexation is a statutory entitlemen...






