This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Cash deposit addition- ITAT condoned delay & criticised ex parte order
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Saroj Kumar Senapati Vs ITO (ITAT Cuttack)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Cuttack
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Saroj Kumar Senapati Vs ITO (ITAT Cuttack)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Cuttack Bench has allowed an appeal for statistical purposes in the case of Saroj Kumar Senapati vs. Income Tax Officer, restoring the matter to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] for fresh adjudication. The case pertains to the Assessment Year 2017-18, centering around estimated income on alleged unexplained cash deposits.
The assessee, an individual engaged in the wholesale rice business, had filed his return declaring a net income of ₹2,98,520. However, scrutiny proceedings were ...





