Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : R.C. Kannan Vs PCIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

R.C. Kannan Vs PCIT (Madras High Court)

Conclusion: AO had to therefore refer the valuation of the property viz., capital asset under proviso to sub-clause (vii)(c) to sub-section 2 to Section 56 of the IT Act to the Valuation Officer. Even if, no objections was raised before AO prior to the assessment order being passed, assessee would still be entitled to raise such objections both before the Revisional Authority under Section 264 of the IT Act or before the Appellate Commissioner under Section 246A of the IT Act as these proceedings are continuation of the origi

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31