Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Cherie Tandon Saldahna Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Cherie Tandon Saldahna Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Allotment Date Stamp Value Applicable u/s 56(2)(x) – Registration Value Cannot Be Adopted Where Consideration Paid Earlier by Cheque – ITAT Mumbai

AO made addition u/s 56(2)(x) on purchase of flat by adopting stamp duty value on date of registration and treated difference of ₹1.14 Cr as income. Assessee contended that flat was allotted in 2011, full consideration paid through banking channel before allotment and hence stamp value on allotment da

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Chennai: No Addition U/s 56(2)(vii) Where Valuation Difference Within 10% Tolerance Band Penalty U/s 270A Deleted – AO Failed to Specify Misreporting Clause ITAT Chennai: Registration u/s 12AB & 80G Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Trust Has Not Yet Started Activities Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable on Deemed Addition U/s 56(2)(vii)(b) – ITAT Chennai ITAT Chennai: 60% Tax U/s 115BBE Not Applicable for AY 2017-18 Transactions Prior to 01-04-2017 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031