Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s JKD Capital & Finlease Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2005- 06
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ld. Counsel of the assessee submitted that the assessee has not been given proper opportunity of being heard. He submitted that the assessment order was passed on 28.12.2007. He submitted that the query in this regard came from the Assessing Officer on 20.12.2007. Within a short while of one week assessee was not in a position to submit the necessary details. The Assessing Officer has proceeded to make the additions without getting the details from the assessee. He further pointed out that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) is also exparte. He prayed that one opportunity may be given to the assessee,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
0 Comments
Cancel reply
sir, This is a really good step. I WANT TO ADD THAT HERE IN ANDHRA PRADESH, SOME OF THE ASSESSING OFFICERS ARE ADDING BACK THE DEDUCTIONS CLAIMED UNDER CHAPTER VI-A WITHOUT GIVING AN OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD AS PER NATURAL JUSTICE AND RAISING HUGE FICTITIOUS DEMAND. WHEN REPRESENTED TO GRIEVANCE CELL, IT WAS STATED THAT A.Os HAVE LIMITED ROLE TO PLAY AND ASKED TO GIVE SPECIFIC INSTANCES. IF AS AN A.R. I FURNISH, I WILL BE TARGETED AND COME UNDER SCRUTINY. HENCE WHAT TO DO. PL. HELP ME FOR REDRESSAL. THANKS
K.PREMSAGAR
The short issue of the case is crystal clear and the Hon’ble ITAT has done is good job. Nothing to give more comment on this issue.