Addition for outstanding loan repaid by assessee subsequently was unjustified

ITO Vs Habitat Infrastructure Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)

The CIT(A) has given detailed finding and taken into consideration of the submissions made by the assessee as well as the remand report of the Assessing Officer called during Appellate Proceedings. In-fact, from the records it emerges that the unaccounted money as alleged by the Assessing Officer was the loan which was repaid subsequently by the assessee. Therefore, there is no need to interfere with the findings of the CIT(A). The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.