prpri PIL challenging constitution of AAR – HC issues Notice to Government PIL challenging constitution of AAR – HC issues Notice to Government

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajendra Kumar Duggar Vs Union of India & Ors. (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : WPA No. 2186 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 25.11.2020
Related Assessment Year :

Rajendra Kumar Duggar Vs Union of India & Ors. (Calcutta High Court)

Hon’ble Calcutta High Court has issued notice to Centre and State Government in a PIL filed by CA Rajendra Kumar Duggar wherein the petitioner has challenged the constitution of the Authority of Advance Ruling and Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under the CGST/SGST Act being ‘Coram non judice’ because of the total absence of a judicial member in the constitution of AAR and AAAR. The AAR and AAAR consists only of technical members as one member is officer of central tax and the other member is officer of State tax.

The matter is being argued by Advocate Vinay Shraff with Advocate Himangshu Kumar Ray on the ground that AAR and AAAR constituted under the CGST/SGST Act are bodies exercising judicial power conferred on it by respective laws and are tribunal within the meaning of the expression in Articles 136 and 227 of the Constitution. Constitution of the AAR and AAAR is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 50 of the Constitution. Article 50 states that “the State shall take steps to separate judiciary from the executive in the public services of the State”. The right to life under Article 21 includes the right to justice by an independent judiciary and by a Tribunal which is free from executive or political influence. It is an established principle of law that an independent judiciary is among the basic features of the Constitution. Total insulation of the judiciary from all forms of interference from the co-ordinate branches of the Government is a basic essential feature of the Constitution. In absence of judicial member in AAR and AAAR, it will lead to executive taking power of judiciary which vitiates the very power of judiciary by making one judge in his own cause. The constitutional guarantee of an independent judicial branch and the constitutional scheme  of  separation  of  powers  can  be  easily  and seriously undermined, if the legislatures were to entrust the Tribunals with Members not being Members of the ‘Judicial service’ of the State.

Download Judgment/Order

Author Bio

More Under Goods and Services Tax

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

August 2021