Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gillette India Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gillette India Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (Madras High Court) Madras High Court, in the case of Gillette India Limited vs Assistant Commissioner, granted the company a final opportunity to respond to a GST demand of Rs. 6.57 crore, contingent on a deposit of Rs. 1 crore. Gillette, a registered GST dealer, had faced scrutiny due to mismatches between its GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A/2B filings. The original tax demand, which had exceeded the proposed sum in the show cause notice by over Rs. 240 crore, was challenged by Gillette on the grounds of exceeding the scope of the notice and jurisdiction...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ashish Kamthania (Saxena), Managing Director : TAX & LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED, RAMPUR UP INDIA currently (at present) : Secretary : TAX BAR ASSOCIATION, RAMPUR UP 244901 INDIA Treasurer : RAMPUR TAX BAR ASSOCIATION, RAMPUR UP 244901 INDIA STATE EXECUTIVE MEMBER : THE UP TAX BAR View Full Profile

My Published Posts

GST on Jewellery vs Making Charges: The Classification Mistake Costing Jewellers GST Registration Restoration Delays Hurt MSMEs: Call for Time-Bound Process इनपुट टैक्स क्रेडिट (ITC) में अस्वीकृत वस्तुओं और सेवायें  पॉपकॉर्न पर GST! भारत को एकल GST दर पर विचार करना होगा सीजीएसटी अधिनियम की धारा 128ए के तहत ब्याज और जुर्माने में छूट के प्रावधान ! View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930