Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 3137 Results

Right to appointment of an Arbitrator does not get automatically forfeited after expiry of 30 days as prescribed under Section 11(4) & 11(5) of the Act – SC

Case Name : Denel (Proprietary Limited) Vs Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Arbitration Petition No. 11 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

In case of default by the employer by an exempted establishment, in making its contribution to the Provident Fund Section 14B of the Act will be applicable – SC

Case Name : Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs The Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd. & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 655 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/01/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

If the working condition and responsibilities and nature of duties are same than all staff should be equally paid -HC

Case Name : Central Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Central Provident Fund Employees’ Union (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 940/2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/01/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Delhi High Court (3368)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

‘Red Label’ cannot be trade mark as words are common to the trade and not distinctive

Case Name : Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs Girnar Exports (IPAB)
Appeal Number : TA/47/2003/TM/CH, OA/34/2004/TM/CH, OA/69/2004/TM/CH
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/01/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Others (19)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

If refrence to BIFR was rejected in previous years on merits then fresh references in subsequent years should not be mechanically entertained

Case Name : Alcatel-Lucent India Ltd. Vs Usha India Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. (C) NO. 12723 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Delhi High Court (3368)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Termination of contractual job can be challenged in court – SC

Case Name : GRID-CO Limited & ANR. Vs. Sri Sadananda Doloi & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 11303 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/12/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

Public sector financial institutions under obligation to fairly consider OTS proposal keeping in mind the RBI guidelines – Delhi HC

Case Name : Arjun Industries Ltd & ANR Vs Industrial Development Bank of India & ANR. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : LPA 380/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/12/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Delhi High Court (3368)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

RTI – CIC has no power to direct Public Authority to furnish information – SC

Case Name : Chief Information Commissioner and Another- Appellant(s) Vs State of Manipur and Another- Respondent(s) (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal Nos. 10787-10788 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/12/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Case pending in a lower court cannot be forwarded to another court till the decision taken by the lower court

Case Name : Ram Naresh Singh Vs. Lal Singh And Another (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Matters Under Article 227 No.- 2276 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/12/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Allahabad High Court (800)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

NPA of a Company defaulting in repayment of loan can be assigned for the debt

Case Name : Hindon River Mills Ltd. Vs Ifci Ltd. & Anr. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : LPA No. 112/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/12/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Delhi High Court (3368)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031