If refrence to BIFR was rejected in previous years on merits then fresh references in subsequent years should not be mechanically entertained

HIGH COURT OF DELHI Alcatel-Lucent India Ltd. V/s. Usha India Ltd. W.P. (C) NO. 12723 OF 2012 JUNE 1, 2012 ORDER A.K. Sikri, Actg. CJ. The petitioner feels aggrieved by the action of the respondent Usha India Limited in making repeated references before the BIFR and appeals therefrom before the AAIFR, even when previous references made by the petitioner were rejected. The grievances of the petitioner is that it amounts to continuous and systematic abuse of process resorted to by Usha India limited with the sole motive of delaying and defeating the rights of its creditors. Usha...