Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 2226 Results

Order of Commissioner (Appeals) remitting back case for verification or quantification is not a remand order

Case Name : Commissioner of Service Tax Vs M/s Akamai Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. st/2370 OF 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Bangalore (304)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Services in relation to import of raw materials are input services

Case Name : Craft Corner Paper Mills Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. E/526 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Service tax paid on audit of assessee’s unit in compliance with environmental laws is eligible for credit

Case Name : M/s. Sujal Dye Chem Industries Vs CCE (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/715/Wzb/Ahd/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/05/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Retrospective amendment levying service tax on renting of immovable property is constitutionally valid

Case Name : R.R. Ahuja Vs Union of India (Madhya Pradesh High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 14658 Of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/09/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Madhya Pradesh HC (176)

Prior to 1-4-2011 there was no requirement to maintain separate a/c for trading activities

Case Name : Micro Labs Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. E/ST/1931-1938 of 2011 & E/3088-3095 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/05/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Bangalore (304)

Bona fide belief/Retrospective amendment in law doesn’t warrant invocation of extended period of limitation

Case Name : Infinity Infotech Parks Ltd. Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 21549 (W) Of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Delhi High Court (3368)

Penalty should not be imposed in revenue neutral cases

Case Name : CCL Products (India) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/2295 OF 2010 & E/1974 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/05/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Bangalore (304)

Insurance captive power plant is an input service eligible for Cenvat Credit

Case Name : Hindalco Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT New Delhi)
Appeal Number : Central Excise Appeal No. 44 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/05/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Benefit of Rule 6(3) cannot be denied by applying Rule 6(4B) of Service Tax Rules

Case Name : HaidergarhChini Mills Vs Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT New Delhi)
Appeal Number : Appeal No.ST/23/2011-SM(BR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/05/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Service tax on Security charges of River Water Pumping Unit used as coolant in manufacturing are input services

Case Name : Welspun Maxsteel Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. St/291 & 292/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031