Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 2226 Results

No provision U/s. 85 to condone delay beyond period of 3 months on expiry of limitation period

Case Name : Amhar Associates Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Lucknow (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Application No. ST/STAY/3453 OF 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Repair services provided by shipchandlers authorised by ‘port’ amounted to ‘port service’

Case Name : Kandla Shipchandlers & Ship Repairers Association Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Special Civil Application No. 24997 OF 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Gujarat High Court (1139)

Extended period not to be invoked if order in assessee’s favour is overruled by a larger bench

Case Name : Nice Color Lab Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 55434-55435 OF 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

‘Rent-a-cab service’ for transportation of staff from railway station to container freight station run by assessee is eligible input service

Case Name : Allcargo Global Logistics Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Order Nos. A/273/2012/SMB/C-IV & S/452/2012/SMB/C-IV
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/09/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)

Ticket Booking for other bus/tour operators is ‘business auxiliary services’ and liable to ST

Case Name : Sharma Transports Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 533 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Bangalore (304)

Rent-a-cab service for transport of employees/officials or business related visitors to factory/office is an input service

Case Name : Sandvik Asia Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 607 & 608 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Bangalore (304)

Principle of doctrine of unjust enrichment not applies to refund of ‘deposit of duty’

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata-VII Vs Krypton Industries (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A-334 (KOL.) OF 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/10/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Kolkata (370)

Service tax on Income from auction of abandoned cargo?

Case Name : In re Sical Distriparks Ltd. (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Order-in-Appeal No. 121 of 2011 (MST)
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Chennai (646)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Service tax not payable on Service of MD as it’s not ‘Management Consultancy Services’

Case Name : Bosch Chassis Systems India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Order Nos. A/32/2013/CSTB/C-I & S/86/2013/CSTB/C-I
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)

Drawings / designs expressed on a media is classified as good Under Excise / Custom tariff so not liable to service tax

Case Name : Mitsui & Co. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Jamshedpur (Kolkata High Court)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A-255/KOL./2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/04/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Calcutta High Court (840) Kolkata High Court (20)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031