Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Commissioner ate Vs M/s Jai Shree Agro Industries Ltd. (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Whether penalty U/s. 11AC of Central Excise Act is mandatory and equal to the duty demanded or the authority has discretion to impose lesser penalty? We do not find that on all the four counts, demand was raised on the ground of clearance of goods with intent to evade payment of duty. Demand relating to third count and relating to samples was clearly demand on account of legal issues so it cannot be held that there was intention to evade payment of duty. So penalty in respect of these two counts is not sustainable. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CEA No. 139 of 2006 Commi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930