This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CAAR Denies APTA Benefit Due to Absence of Third-Party Invoicing Provision
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- In re Jparks India Private Limited (CAAR Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Advance Rulings, CAAR
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
In re Jparks India Private Limited (CAAR Mumbai)
The Authority for Advance Rulings, Customs (CAAR), Mumbai examined whether preferential customs duty benefits under the Asia-Pacific Trade Agreement (APTA) could be claimed in cases involving third-party invoicing, with reference to Notification No. 50/2018-Customs dated 30 June 2018 and the Rules of Origin notified under Notification No. 94/2006-Customs (N.T.).
The applicant sought advance rulings on multiple questions, primarily whether third-party invoicing is permissible under APTA and, if so, whether preferential duty benef...






