Jharkhand High Court held that once the penalties are cancelled on the ground that there is no concealment, the quashing of prosecution under section 276C of the Income Tax Act is automatic.
Jharkhand High Court decided not to interfere on issue of leviability of tax on work of transportation of coal under GTA services leviable at 12% under Chapter Heading No. 9965 or 18% under Chapter Heading No. 9986 at the investigation stage.
Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application as the person is likely to hamper the investigation as already there were attempts to submit the false certificate to obtain the benefit on medical grounds. Further, if the bail is granted, the petitioner is also likely to temper the evidences.
Jharkhand HC held that for verification of transitional credit, GST authorities cannot issue SCN under Section 73 of CGST Act, 2017 questioning eligibility to credit under erstwhile law
Jharkhand High Court held that bail granted as the petitioner was held to be not at flight risk and also there was no possibility of tampering the evidence or influencing/ intimidating the witness.
Jharkhand High Court held that once registration has been granted under section 12AA after satisfying about genuineness of the activities of the Trust, the same cannot be cancelled on the basis of the same set of provisions of the Trust.
RSB Transmissions India Limited Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court) A combined reading of Section 49(1) of CGST Act, 2017 and Rule 87 (6) and (7) of CGST Rules, 2017 both go to show that such deposit does not mean that the amount is appropriated towards the Government exchequer. On other hand other, a […]
Mahalaxmi Infra Contract Ltd. Vs Goods and Services Tax Council (Jharkhand High Court) In the instant case it appears that on account of an inadvertent error, the entry relating to Tax Invoice No. 01/2018- 19 dated 17th January 2019 could not be reflected in the GSTR-1 filed by the petitioner against the GSTIN of Eastern […]
Jharkhand High Court held that acceptance of bribe duly proved and accordingly, a punishment of six months simple imprisonment under Section 7 of the PC Act and one year’s simple imprisonment under Section 13 (2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of the P.C. Act with a fine of Rs.1000 sentenced for accepting bribe for furnishing Income Tax clearance certificate
Petitioner is a Chartered Accountant by profession and after passing the examination, he became eligible to be appointed as an Insolvency Professional by the Committee of Creditors under Section 3(19) of IBC, 2016 for handling the companies under liquidation.
