ITAT Surat quashes CIT(A) order for not considering assessee’s submissions, directing the AO to reassess the case with due opportunity for the assessee.
ITAT Surat rules against PCIT’s revision under Section 263, stating the Assessing Officer’s view on Unique Polypack transactions was legally sustainable.
Assessee didnot file ITR for AY 2012-13 during which assessee made cash deposit of Rs.45,69,722/-. The case was reopened and notice u/s 148 was sent through e-mail against which no ITR was filed. Hence, AO made addition u/s 69A.
ITAT deletes addition of Rs. 48.48 lakh for penny stock investment, ruling that no concrete evidence was presented by the Income Tax authorities.
ITAT Surat allows appeal in the case of Kiwans Farsuram Bhamwala Vs ITO. Case remanded to AO for fresh examination, granting assessee another hearing opportunity.
Assessee was engaged in the business of manufacturing of diamond by cutting and polishing of rough diamond and sale thereof. During assessment, Assessing Officer noted that assessee has made 20 transactions of foreign remittance.
As regarding disallowance of interest-free loans on unsecured loans, it was concluded that the same were part of routine business transactions and were of short-term nature therefore, no addition for interest charged on the loans.
ITAT Surat held that it is mandatory to provide proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee before finalization of revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Surat held that addition towards cash deposited during demonetization restricted to 10% of total deposit since assessee fully substantiated the cash deposit showing sufficient withdrawal. Accordingly, appeal partly allowed.
ITAT Surat held that disallowance of unaccounted purchases restricted to 12.5% of purchases instead of 25% as held by CIT(A). Accordingly, addition towards unaccounted purchases restricted.
