ITAT Rajkot held that denying the exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act merely on the ground of belated filing of return by the assessee is not justifiable.
ITAT Rajkot held that interest under section 234A and 234B can be levied only up to the date of self-assessment tax paid and not for period beyond that date.
ITAT Rajkot held that penalty under section 271F of the Income Tax Act not leviable as post search there was delay in providing seized documents. Further, Checking, cross checking and reconciliation of datas was a very lengthy process is also a reasonable cause for non-furnishing of income tax return.
Rudraksh Detergent & Chemicals Pvt Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Rajkot) Controversy before us relates whether the expenses incurred by the assessee on the road construction amounts to capital expenditure in the given facts and circumstances. There is no ambiguity that the assessee shall gain the benefit out of the road expenses incurred by it. But […]
ITAT Rajkot held that conversion of agricultural land into non-agricultural land and sale thereof, such sale consideration is received from sale of non-agricultural land and hence the same is taxable under income tax.
Batuk Vithalabhai Donga Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) If addition under section 80U is not made under section 68 or 69, then tax cannot be imposed under section 115BBE Assessee has not challenged the additions made by the AO under section 80U and 80G of the Act, but has only challenged the computation of tax liability […]
ITAT Rajkot held that the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Act cannot be denied only on the basis that the assessee did not file its return of income within due date u/s 139(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Medi Seva Sahakari Mandali Ltd Vs ADIT (ITAT Rajkot) Held by the Rajkot Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the case of [2023] 146 taxmann.com 3 (Rajkot – Trib.) Medi Seva Sahakari Mandali Ltd. V ADIT (CPC) that deduction u/s 80P could not be denied only on the basis that assessee did not […]
Sureshkumar K Kataria Vs DCIT (ITAT Rajkot) ITAT notes that there was mismatch in the gross income reported by the assessee viz a viz the income reflecting in form 26AS for an amount of Rs. 4,13,081.00 only. As such, the assessee has shown less income by the impugned amount, therefore concurrent view was taken by […]
Kiran Roadlines Vs ACIT (ITAT Rajkot) The assessee is a registered firm in the business of transportation. It appears that for A.Y. 2004-05 & 2005-06 identical penalty debited to P&L account has been allowed by he Ld. CIT(A). In appeal preferred before the ITAT by the Revenue dated 06.03.2009, the Hon’ble Bench has been pleased […]
