Key highlights of the ITAT Cochin order in Premalatha Korottoliprasantham Vs ITO for AY 2017-18, addressing non-filing of returns and cash deposits during demonetisation.
ITAT Cochin remands ₹70.25 lakh foreign remittance case, citing lack of reasoning in CIT(A) order. Case to be reconsidered following principles of natural justice.
ITAT Cochin remands case after CIT(A) dismisses appeal without considering additional evidence under Rule 46A in an unexplained money addition dispute.
ITAT Cochin remands case for fresh hearing after CIT(A) dismissed appeal without considering the explanation for a 30-day delay in filing.
ITAT Cochin remanded Baiju Kabeer’s case to CIT(A) for reassessment, citing lack of opportunity to explain cash deposits. Review the details of the judgment here.
ITAT Cochin rules AO’s assessment must be both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue for S.263 proceedings. Delay condoned; appeal allowed for Kool Home Builders.
ITAT Cochin dismisses duplicate appeal filed by Revenue against Geojit Financial Services Ltd. for AY 2018-19, ruling it as infructuous and not maintainable.
ITAT Cochin held that disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules in a mechanical manner without recording proper satisfaction is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, addition set aside.
ITAT Cochin held that denial of registration u/s. 80G to the existing trust alleging belated filing of application applying sub clause (iii) of proviso to section 80G(5) unjustified as the same apply to newly formed trust only.
ITAT Cochin held that treating section 153D of the Income Tax Act as pari-materia to section 148 mechanism without any such indication in the Act is unjustified and hence matter remanded back to CIT(A).