Courts: Chhattisgarh High Court
409 articlesCorporate Law

Corporate Law
In order to maintain a writ petition questioning appointment of a person, the writ petitioner must be a person qualified for the post/non-appointee.
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
Mere acquittal in criminal case is not a ground for reinstatement, if termination is outcome of a departmental enquiry
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
A member of District Consumer Redressal Forum on completion of his/her tenure has no vested right for re-appointment.
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
A Government servant cannot hold two substantive posts at same time
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
Principles of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectaion would not apply to allot shops by Municipality contrary to Rules of allotment
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
Person detained in jail despite release order by appellate Court is entitled for compensation of his illegal detention for breach of his fundamental right under Article 21 of Constitution of India
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
Vehicle seized under Section 39(1)(d) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 cannot be property of the Government unless finding is recorded by Criminal Court that vehicle is used for commission of offence.
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
Agreement providing for arbitaration by the CG Arbitaration Tribunal. Section 9 and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would not apply
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
Cadre post of Labour Commissioner to be filled by cadre officer (member of IAS), cannot be filled by member of IFS.
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
National Coal Wage Agreement (NCWA) has a force of law; terms of NCWA should be fair and reasonable and should not be opposed to law
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
A person suspected of an offence cannot be forced to undergo Narco-analysis, BEAP and polygraph tests without his consent
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
Petitioners/dealers carrying-on their business in railway area are liable to pay entry tax under the Chhattisgarh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976.
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
Courts should not make adverse remarks agianst party/litigant unless really necessary for just decision of case and opportunity of hearing should be afforded before making such remarks
Corporate Law

Corporate Law
