Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Archive

Courts: Chhattisgarh High Court

409 articles
Corporate LawIn order to maintain a writ petition questioning appointment of a person, the writ petitioner must be a person qualified for the post/non-appointee.
Corporate Law

In order to maintain a writ petition questioning appointment of a person, the writ petitioner must be a person qualified for the post/non-appointee.

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawMere acquittal in criminal case is not a ground for reinstatement, if termination is outcome of a departmental enquiry
Corporate Law

Mere acquittal in criminal case is not a ground for reinstatement, if termination is outcome of a departmental enquiry

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawA member of District Consumer Redressal Forum on completion of his/her tenure has no vested right for re-appointment.
Corporate Law

A member of District Consumer Redressal Forum on completion of his/her tenure has no vested right for re-appointment.

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawA Government servant cannot hold two substantive posts at same time
Corporate Law

A Government servant cannot hold two substantive posts at same time

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawPrinciples of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectaion would not apply to allot shops by Municipality contrary to Rules of allotment
Corporate Law

Principles of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectaion would not apply to allot shops by Municipality contrary to Rules of allotment

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawPerson detained in jail despite release order by appellate Court is entitled for compensation of his illegal detention for breach of his fundamental right under Article 21 of Constitution of India
Corporate Law

Person detained in jail despite release order by appellate Court is entitled for compensation of his illegal detention for breach of his fundamental right under Article 21 of Constitution of India

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawVehicle seized under Section 39(1)(d) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 cannot be property of the Government unless finding is recorded by Criminal Court that vehicle is used for commission of offence.
Corporate Law

Vehicle seized under Section 39(1)(d) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 cannot be property of the Government unless finding is recorded by Criminal Court that vehicle is used for commission of offence.

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawAgreement providing for arbitaration by the CG Arbitaration Tribunal. Section 9 and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would not apply
Corporate Law

Agreement providing for arbitaration by the CG Arbitaration Tribunal. Section 9 and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would not apply

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawCadre post of Labour Commissioner to be filled by cadre officer (member of IAS), cannot be filled by member of IFS.
Corporate Law

Cadre post of Labour Commissioner to be filled by cadre officer (member of IAS), cannot be filled by member of IFS.

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawNational Coal Wage Agreement (NCWA) has a force of law; terms of NCWA should be fair and reasonable and should not be opposed to law
Corporate Law

National Coal Wage Agreement (NCWA) has a force of law; terms of NCWA should be fair and reasonable and should not be opposed to law

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawA person suspected of an offence cannot be forced to undergo Narco-analysis, BEAP and polygraph tests without his consent
Corporate Law

A person suspected of an offence cannot be forced to undergo Narco-analysis, BEAP and polygraph tests without his consent

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawPetitioners/dealers carrying-on their business in railway area are liable to pay entry tax under the Chhattisgarh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976.
Corporate Law

Petitioners/dealers carrying-on their business in railway area are liable to pay entry tax under the Chhattisgarh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976.

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawCourts should not make adverse remarks agianst party/litigant unless really necessary for just decision of case and opportunity of hearing should be afforded before making such remarks
Corporate Law

Courts should not make adverse remarks agianst party/litigant unless really necessary for just decision of case and opportunity of hearing should be afforded before making such remarks

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawLok Aayog has no jurisdiction and authority to pass orders directing departmental enquiry and consequent recovery, it can only make recommendations for such an action.
Corporate Law

Lok Aayog has no jurisdiction and authority to pass orders directing departmental enquiry and consequent recovery, it can only make recommendations for such an action.

Editor10 years ago