CESTAT Kolkata’s order on Commissioner of Customs vs. KEC International Limited. Justifying burden of customs duty, accounting not conclusive proof. Detailed analysis and conclusions.
CESTAT Kolkata held that question of unjust enrichment in terms of section 27(2) of the Customs Act doesn’t not arise as imported goods are used as raw material for manufacture of final product i.e. imported goods are not sold to someone else.
Read the detailed analysis of JKG Infralogistics Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs case. CESTAT Kolkata sets aside penalties, citing lack of evidence for Customs Broker violations.
CESTAT Kolkata rules in favor of Jet Airways in the case of remnant ATF valuation. Detailed analysis of the order and its implications for the aviation industry.
CESTAT Kolkata held that benefit of notification no. 4/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006 is available on imported manganese ore lumps, crushed, screened, washed having ‘Mn’ content of 43%/45% (approx).
CESTAT Kolkata held that confiscation of boondi silver and silver jewellary alleging it to be smuggled goods without any evidence to allege that these are third country origin is unsustainable in law.
CESTAT Kolkata rules that procedural lapses shouldn’t obstruct substantive customs duty benefits. Case analysis of Softel Overseas Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs.
SP Agency Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Kolkata) Suspension of Customs Broker Licence not warranted if appellant not deliberately classified the goods to evade payment of duty
Explore the legal battle between Premier Trading Company and Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Kolkata) over rejected unit value, customs valuation rules, and market inquiry.
CESTAT Kolkata ruling in Bansal Biscuits case, where the time limit under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act is deemed inapplicable for claiming refunds on erroneously paid Service Tax.
