A deep dive into CESTAT Kolkata’s ruling in Commissioner of Customs Vs K.K. Woollens, where the court confirmed penalties for undetermined imports of used clothes.
CESTAT Kolkata held that appellant were under the bonafide belief that processes undertaken by them doesn’t amount to manufacture and accordingly, they cleared goods to raw material supplier on collection of job charges only. Accordingly, extended period of limitation not invocable.
Dive into the legal complexities of the Commissioner of Customs Vs S K P Enterprises case (CESTAT Kolkata), which revolves around the import of restricted old and used clothing. Get insights on why CESTAT dismissed the appeal for enhanced fines.
CESTAT Kolkata held that naphtha used for generation of electricity which is consumed within the factory of production is eligible for Cenvat Credit.
CESTAT Kolkata held that onus cast on appellant u/s 123 not having been discharged, hence concluded that contraband gold smuggled from a third country of origin is liable to absolute confiscation.
In Mars Mountain Security Services vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, CESTAT Kolkata clarified non-taxability of Man-Power services before June 16, 2005.
Analysis of CESTAT Kolkata’s judgment in Nitco World Travels vs Commissioner of Service Tax. How it impacts the taxation on commission from Amadeus India.
CESTAT Kolkata order in Rajib Saha Vs Commissioner of Customs. Learn how CESTAT quashed the differential duty demand Without Challenging Original Bills of Entry Assessment on PPC Cement imported from Bangladesh.
A detailed analysis of the landmark CESTAT Kolkata ruling in Emta Coal Limited vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax. Understand the legal implications for Cenvat Credit on Capital Goods in the context of providing output services.
CESTAT Kolkata ruling on Berger Paints India Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Excise: Can Cenvat Credit be denied based on non-registration or delayed registration as an Input Service Distributor (ISD)?
