CESTAT Kolkata

Service Tax Penalty cannot be imposed u/s. 76 and 78 simultaneously

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Mittal Technopack (P.) Ltd. (CESTAT Kolkata)

We are of the view that even if technically, scope of sections 76 and 78 of the Act may be different, as submitted on behalf of the revenue, the fact that penalty has been levied under section 78 could be taken into account for levying or not levying penalty under section 76 of the Act. In such situation, even if reasoning given by the ap...

Read More

Commissioner (Appeals) do not have power of remand under Service Tax Laws

Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata Vs Devansh Exports (CESTAT Kolkata)

Thus in case of service tax also the Commissioner (A) is not empowered to remand the matter, he has to decide the matter by himself. Therefore the order of ld. Commissioner (Appeals) remanding the case to the lower authority, is not sustainable. ...

Read More

Refund cannot be denied merely because export invoice numbers not mentioned on lorry receipts

Khatau Narbheram & Co. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise Customs & Service tax (CESTAT Kolkata)

No doubt the Notification requires that details of export invoices should be mentioned in lorry receipts and shipping bills, however, there is no bar to provide these details separately in case the original lorry receipts/shipping bills did not contain these details. The Revenue is free to insist on verification in such cases and refund c...

Read More

Service tax Refund allowable on GTA Service for transportation of goods from place of removal to port of export

East India Minerals Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax (CESTAT Kolkata)

We find that the impugned exemption notification allowing refund of service tax paid in respect of exports has been issued with the sole objective of removing the burden of service tax from the export goods. It has been rightly contended by the ld. advocate that it is the avowed policy of the Government not to export domestic tax along wi...

Read More

In absence of proof that Assessee was a mutual fund distributor or agent thereof, Service tax payable on commission

Union Enterprises Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur (CESTAT Kolkata)

Assessee procured mutual fund subscription for SKP Securities Ltd. and Eastern Financial Ltd. The applicants are not mutual fund distributors nor they are agents thereof. The applicants could not produce any evidence in this regard. Therefore, the case law in the case of P.N. Vijay Financial Services (P.) Ltd. (supra) us not applicable to...

Read More

Penalty not leviable for short-payment of service tax due to non-understanding of law

Gemini Veterans Security & Vigilance Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata (CESTAT Kolkata)

The assessee was registered with the Central Excise Department on its own on 16-6-2005. It was a proprietorship concern and it was required to file the service tax returns quarterly, which it had been filing meticulously with the Department. However, due to non-understanding of the relevant provisions of law, there was some short-payment ...

Read More

No Penalty for Non payment of service tax due to sudden crash in stock market

N.V. Securities Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Siliguri (CESTAT Kolkata)

The assessee had reflected the service tax liability on account of service provided by him during the period April, 2007 to September, 2007 in the ST-3 returns filed with the department. The reason for delay in making payment had been sufficiently explained by the assessee in his reply, stating that due to sudden crash in the stock market...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,353)
Company Law (5,139)
Custom Duty (7,476)
DGFT (4,040)
Excise Duty (4,274)
Fema / RBI (3,887)
Finance (4,045)
Income Tax (31,132)
SEBI (3,232)
Service Tax (3,477)