Analyze the CESTAT Chandigarh order in M R Beltings vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, focusing on the issue of willful suppression and its impact on excise duty demand.
Exploring the key details of the GKN Driveline (India) Ltd vs CCE case at CESTAT Chandigarh, and its impact on the reversal of Cenvat Credit under Rule 3(5B).
Understand why a mere delay in verification isn’t enough to allege fact suppression under Section 11A. Intent matters. Learn more in this analysis.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that scrap generated during manufacture can be removed without payment of duty for job work and can be used as inputs.
Dive into legal complexities and key takeaways of case Crown Milk Specialities Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs concerning conversion of shipping bills from Drawback to DEPB Scheme.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that service tax demand under reverse charge mechanism unsustainable in case the IPR is registered in any foreign country and is not registered in India.
CESTAT Chandigarh rules in Ahluwalia Contracts case: Free supply items’ value isn’t included in service tax calculation. Read a detailed breakdown.
Examining the CESTAT Chandigarh order on Chanakya Communication’s appeal. The judgment pertains to Cenvat Credit claim rights linked to service tax payment.
Read about the CESTAT Chandigarh order on Excise Duty for R.B. Forging (P) Ltd. vs CCE. Discover the legal insights & implications on Rough Forgings.
Analysis of Jagjeet Singh Parwana vs Commissioner of Central Excise case. Non-specific show-cause notice’s impact on Service Tax demand set aside by CESTAT Chandigarh.
