Nirmal Bang Securities Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) In this case reasons quoted were bereft of any material as AO quoted that search information is received with regard to accommodation entry But does not indicate what address was searched, from whom such information was received, what date the search happened, what date the […]
The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of CGST (Bombay High Court) The Petitioner has filed reply to the Show Cause Notice (SCN)within four weeks from the date of receipt of the said notice and did not get any further communication from the Respondent for hearing or any adjudication upon the said […]
Essar Shipping Limited Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) By instituting this writ petition, petitioner seeks to challenge Policy Circular No. 25 of 2007 dated 1st January, 2008 issued by DGFT, the second respondent. According to the petitioner, in the garb of purported clarification, the DGFT has curtailed benefits available to service providers, such […]
Satyanarayan Bankatlal Malu Vs IBBI (Bombay High Court) It can be noticed that under Section 435 of the Companies Act, Special Court, comprising of Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge, was in place since 2013 and it retained its jurisdiction to try the offences under the Companies Act. Amendment of 2017, for the first time brought […]
Tata Sons Limited Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court) Bombay High Court find substance in the submission of Mr.Pardiwalla that the case at hand is nothing but an instance of mere change of opinion. A bare perusal of the reasons indicates that the exercise was infuenced by a mere change of opinion. To start with, it […]
Dee Vee Projects Ltd. Vs Government of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) Order not specifying amount to the extent to which the ECL has been blocked is Illegal A careful perusal of Rule 86-A would show that there is no specific mention therein about the blocking of the ECL and what is stated is that the […]
Bombay High Court condones 8-year delay in filing appeals against penalty orders. Ruling benefits assessees facing prosecution after penalty payment.
Yogesh Waman Athavale Vs Vikram Abasaheb Jadhav (Bombay High Court) 1. The petitioner, by way of filing the present petition prays for initiating contempt proceedings against respondent No.1, who is Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chiplun, District Ratnagiri, for allegedly disregarding the binding precedents of the Superior Courts. 2. The petitioner, […]
Dr. Surendra Manjrekar Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) IN this case F.I.R. itself shows that the deceased was taking treatment for his stress management. He was disturbed and in the disturbed state of mind he had committed suicide. So, there is possibility that his commission of suicide was a result of his mental […]
UCC Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs UOI (Bombay High Court) In the facts of this case also the respondents had issued a summons only on 30th August, 2019 i.e. after 30th June, 2019 and thus summons issued after the cut-off date of 30th June, 2019 could not be the ground for declaring the application filed by […]
