Amritha Raj gets a second chance at appeal in ITAT Bangalore. Non-appearance costs imposed but opportunity granted to present case before CIT(A)
Purchase and sale of shares were arranged transactions to create bogus capital short term capital loss in the garb of real transactions with the sole motive to claim short term capital loss so as to evade tax. Hence the same was not allowable under section 28.
It is normal presumption that, if the deposits have been made from the cash balance available in the books of accounts, then the sources of the cash would stand explained and hence, there is no necessity to treat it as unexplained deposits warranting addition.
The admitted position in the present case is that the assessee did not file any valuation report to substantiate the fair market value of shares issued in terms of Sec.56(2)(viib) (a)(i) of the Act and Rule 11UA of the Rules.
Sneha Nerli Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) We are of the opinion that assessee has to prove with evidences that sufficient cash was available to deposit to her bank account. In the present case, assessee claimed that she has been working in Dubai and that the cash deposit in India were on account of amounts earned […]
Bagadia Properties Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) It cannot be always presumed that the loans given to subsidiary companies are for business purposes. It is required to be proved that the subsidiary company has used the interest free loans for some business purposes. Facts- The assessee is undertaking the business of real estate development […]
Methods (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Karnataka High Court in the case of Essae Teraoka Pvt. Ltd Vs. DCIT (supra)¸ had held that the assessee would be entitled to deduction of employees’ contribution to PF and ESI provided that the payments were made prior to the due date of filing of the return […]
Madanthyar Primary Agricultural Credit Co-operative Society Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The notices in question were issued during the covid period and the Assessee’s contention that it could not respond to the notices in view of the pandemic situation has to be accepted as a reasonable cause. Facts- As there was delay in filing TDS statement, […]
Smt.Chandrakala Shashidhar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Held that assessee would be entitled to the benefit u/s 54F of the I.T.Act once it is demonstrated that the consideration received on transfer has been invested either in purchasing a residential house or in construction of a residential house even though the transactions are not complete in all […]
Sling Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Payments forming part of CSR were claimed as deduction under section 80G. Held that assessee cannot be denied the benefit of claim under Chapter VI A, which is considered for computing ‘Total Taxable Income”. If assessee is denied this benefit, merely because such payment forms part of […]
