Customs Authority for Advance Rulings, Mumbai, reviews the classification of digital cinema projectors under Indian customs law, analyzing tariff headings 8528 and 9007.
CAAR Mumbai dismisses Viewsonic Technologies’ advance ruling application on data projectors, citing a pending case before the Madras High Court.
CAAR Mumbai denies Audio Distribution House Pvt Ltd’s request for advance ruling on Optoma Interactive Flat Panels, citing prior CESTAT Delhi judgment.
CAAR Mumbai ruled on the classification of ViewSonic Interactive Flat Panels under Customs Tariff heading 8471. Case linked to prior CESTAT Delhi judgment.
CAAR Mumbai rejects Viewsonic India’s advance ruling request on data projector classification, citing pending appeal before Madras High Court.
Advance ruling on Apple Watch and bands’ classification under Customs Tariff Act. Insights on tariff headings, disputes, and applicability for renewal.
Tamil Nadu AAR rules that school transport services provided directly to students are not exempt from GST under Notification No.12/2017. Read the full analysis.
Maharashtra AAR rules stipend reimbursement to training firms is exempt from GST, clarifying pure agent status in industry partnerships.
Gujarat AAAR remands GST ruling on Devendra Kantibhai Patel’s consultancy services to R&B Dept. for fresh review with new project details.
Analysis of GST implications on High Seas Sale transactions under turnkey contracts in the Tecnimont Pvt. Ltd. vs IOCL case as per Gujarat AAAR ruling.
