Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Advance Rulings

India- USA DTAA: Settlement amount against surrender of right to sue, not in nature of future income compensation is not assessable as income: AAR

January 31, 2016 924 Views 0 comment Print

Authority for Advance Rulings held In the case of Aberdeen Claims Administration Inc., USA and Aberdeen Asset Management Plc., UK that there is no doubt that the settlement amount is relatable to Satyam shares

Being original contract and amendments inextricably linked with business of exploration of minerals, assessable u/s 44BB – AAR

January 31, 2016 837 Views 0 comment Print

Authority for Advance Rulings held In the case of Aker Contracting FP ASA, Norway, USA that it is beyond doubt that the consideration received as per amended order is similar to consideration received as per original contract.

Settlement amount against surrender of right to sue, not chargeable to tax either as capital gain or income from other sources – AAR

January 31, 2016 10303 Views 1 comment Print

Authority for Advance Rulings held In the case of Lead Counsel of Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF), USA, that it is clear that even if right to sue is considered as capital asset covered under the definition of transfer within the meaning of section 2(47), its cost of acquisition cannot be determined.

Transfer of shares of Indian company to Singapore Company, by a Mauritius company having no PE, not taxable in India- AAR

January 31, 2016 2489 Views 0 comment Print

Authority for Advance Rulings held In the case of Dow AgroSciences Agricultural Products Ltd, Mauritius that the Article 13 of the Indo-Mauritius DTAA which deals with the taxation of capital gains is not applicable in the present case.

India- Singapore DTAA – Installation project less than 183 days not constitute PE, income not taxable in India– AAR

January 31, 2016 1066 Views 0 comment Print

Authority for Advance Rulings held In the case of Tiong Woon Project & Contracting (Pte) Ltd. that the department has correctly provided a positive response that because the project was continued in India only for 178 days in a fiscal year

India- Ireland DTAA: Transfer of exclusive rights of copyright in computer software, not mandatory to classify receipts as royalty: AAR

January 31, 2016 1285 Views 0 comment Print

Authority for Advance Rulings held In the case of SkillSoft Ireland limited that in the case of Synopsis International Old Ltd. 212 TAXMAN 454 (Kar), high court held that merely because the words non-exclusive and non-transferrable are used in the license agreement, it does not take away the software out of definition of copyright.

Penalty on Indian company as per US Court, not liable to TDS u/s 195 – AAR

January 31, 2016 403 Views 0 comment Print

Authority for Advance Rulings held In the case of Satyam Computer Services Ltd., that it is trite law that unless the payment made attracts the tax under the Income Tax Act, there would be no liability to deduct tax under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act.

India- UK DTAA –Routine managerial services not in nature of technical services, not makes available any technical knowledge having enduring benefits – AAR

January 31, 2016 2881 Views 0 comment Print

Authority for Advance Rulings held In the case of Measurement Technology Limited, UK that the services under agreement No.1 relate to review by Group operation Director and general guidance given by him on financial, operational, human resource, setting up targets and performance appraisal related matters

India- UK DTAA – Supply Management Services by UK company not in the nature of fee for technical services or royalties – AAR

January 31, 2016 1123 Views 0 comment Print

Authority for Advance Rulings held In the case of Cummins Limited, UK that the agreement shows that the CTIL, a company incorporated in India is working with the applicant only to ensure market competitive pricing from the suppliers.

No Service tax leviable on ‘car lease scheme’ of providing vehicles by employers to employees

January 15, 2016 6500 Views 0 comment Print

The Hon’ble Authority for Advance Rulings held that in the instant case, the Applicant charge the amount to its employees for use of the vehicles, which is equivalent to the rent amount paid to the car leasing company i.e. no extra amount is charged from employee.

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031