In re Jotun India Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether recovery of 50% of Parental Health Insurance Premium from employees amounts to ‘supply of service’ under Section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? AAAR has ruled that. they are not rendering any service of health insurance to their employees and hence, […]
Whether the contract entered into with DMRC for supply, erection, installation, commissioning and testing of UPS system qualifies as a supply of works contract under Section 2(119) of the CGST Act?
In re M/s. VFS Global Services Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether the work for ‘Operating Citizen Facilitation Centre (CFC) at various Locations of MCGM on per transaction/receipt basis’ involving the aforesaid Scope of Work would be exempt from GST vide Sr. No.3 & 3A of amended Notification No. 12/2017 – Central (Rate) as on […]
Receipt of the Adoption Fees paid under Regulation 46 of the Adoption Regulations, 2017 by the Prospective Adoptive Parents to the Trust is exempted from the levy of Goods and Services Tax.
Whether receipt of prize money from horse race conducting entities, in the event horse owned by the applicant wins the race, would amount to ‘supply under section 7 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 or not and consequently, liable to GST or not?
In re M/s. Rotary Club of Mumbai Western Elite (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question: – The amount collected by Rotary club is towards convenience of members and pooled together for paying meeting expenses, communication expenses, RI per capita dues, subscription fees to the Rotarian or Rotary regional magazine, district per capita assessment and the same is […]
It can decisively be concluded that the question posed by the Appellant i.e. whether the GST is applicable on the Investment Advisory and Management Fees collected from the overseas Investors, is beyond the jurisdiction of the Advance Ruling, and hence cannot be decided by the Advance Ruling Authority
The applicant has raised a question, whether separate registration is required in the State of Karnataka for the work contract awarded to him in the State of Karnataka? In this regard we observe that the question raised by the applicant is outside the purview of this authority. The authority for Advance Ruling is created under SGST/UTSGST Act and thus ruling pronounced are applicable within the particular state only, it is for this reason that questions relating to requirement of GST registration in another state is beyond the jurisdiction of this authority and hence no ruling can be given.
In re Maarq Spaces Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) 1. Whether the activity of development and sale of land attract tax under GST? In the instant case what the applicant receives as their remuneration for the provision of the services of development of the land and their subsequent activities related to the sale of the […]
Whether the applicant is liable to pay GST on the machines given to the customers under RRC/PRC models? The applicant is liable to pay GST on the machines / equipments given to the customers under the PRC Model but is not liable to pay GST on the machines / equipments given to the Customers under the RRC model.
