Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Advance Rulings

First GST AA Decision- Section 129 proceeding cannot be initiated for Minor mistake(s) in e-way bill

December 7, 2019 20709 Views 0 comment Print

In case a consignment of goods is accompanied with an invoice or any other specified document and also an e-way bill, proceedings under section 129 of the CGST Act may not be initiated in case of minor mistakes like error in one or two digits/characters of the vehicle number.

Time barred ARA order rectification application not maintainable

December 3, 2019 564 Views 0 comment Print

Further, the applicant has filed rectification application on 10.10.2019 which is beyond the statutory limit of six months as prescribed under Section 102 of CGST Act/MGST Act, 2017. It is delayed and barred by limitation. Therefore, the said application is not found tenable under scope of rectification. Hence it is rejected.

AAR allows ‘Life Health Foods’ to withdraw application

December 3, 2019 623 Views 0 comment Print

In re Life Health Foods India Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Maharashtra) The Application in GST ARA Form No. 01 of M/s. Life Health Foods India Pvt Ltd., vide reference ARA No. 44 dated 18.09.2019, is disposed of, as being withdrawn voluntarily and unconditionally. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA PROCEEDINGS (under […]

AAR not allowed to answer question raised by Non-supplier

December 3, 2019 810 Views 0 comment Print

The applicant have themselves submitted that the scrap is the property of the vendors. Hence question with respect to taxability of sale/supply of such scrap can be raised only by the concerned vendors and not by the applicant. Hence in view of the provisions of Section 95 of the GST Act, since the supply of scrap, will not be undertaken/is proposed to be undertaken, by  the applicant, we are of the opinion that this authority is not allowed to answer the question raised by the applicant, being out of the purview of sec. 95 of CGST Act.

AAR cannot decide on Surrender of GST registration

December 3, 2019 8676 Views 0 comment Print

In other words, Section 97(2), which encompasses the questions, for the ruling by this Authority does not deal with the issue of whether a GST registration should be surrendered. Hence, it is held that this authority does not have jurisdiction to pass any ruling on such matters.

Nicotine Polacrilex Lozenge falls under Chapter Heading 38.24: AAAR Karnataka

December 3, 2019 606 Views 0 comment Print

In re Strides Emerging Markets Ltd (GST AAAR Karnataka) The active ingredient in ‘Nicotine Polacrilex Lozenge’ is Nicotine which is a natural alkaloid. Nicotine is bound to an ion-exchange resin (polymethacrilic acid) and administered in the form of tablets, chewing gum, lozenge or patches The chemical formulation of the nicotine bound to the resin polacrilexis […]

Anaerobic Microbial Inoculum classifiable under Tariff heading No. 30029030

December 2, 2019 1434 Views 0 comment Print

In re Rajeev Kumar, Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/s. Elefo Biotech Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Uttarakhand) The present appeal has been filed by the Assistant commissioner CGST review/concerned officer and asked to pass necessary order holing that the AMI is classifiable under other enzymes of microbial origin’ ‘other’ falling under chapter sub-heading 35079069 of heading 3507 […]

GST Payable by security Agency on payment received for bonus of security personnel deployed

November 29, 2019 5037 Views 0 comment Print

In re Ex-servicemen Resettlement Society (GST AAR West Bengal) Employer’s contribution to EPF, ESI etc. and payment of Bonus at the Government approved rate are, therefore, components of the Applicant’s expenditure. It is entitled to pass this liability to the recipient, who, in terms of the Agreement, is apparently ready to bear that liability. Such […]

AAR rejects application as Applicant was not the Supplier of Service

November 29, 2019 591 Views 0 comment Print

The Applicant’s question is related to the components of the amount that the Licensor, as supplier of the service of leasing of immovable property, is charging on it. They are not related to the supplies the Applicant makes or intends to make. This Authority cannot, therefore, provide a decision to the Applicant in the form of an advance ruling.

Fried Fryums’ classifiable under Tariff Item 21069099

November 28, 2019 3690 Views 0 comment Print

In re Alisha Foods (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Heading 2106 is an omnibus heading covering all kind of edible preparations, not elsewhere specified or included. Chapter Note 5 provides an inclusive definition of this heading and covers preparations for use either directly or after processing, for human consumption. In 5(b) above preparation for use after […]

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031