Explore the Kali Shankar Enterprises vs Additional Commissioner case. Andhra Pradesh High Court rules GST cancellation cannot be based on filing nil returns for over six months. Full judgment included.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the phrase ‘duty of customs’ used in Section 26(1)(a) of SEZ Act only refers to duty leviable under Customs Act, 1962 but the said phrase does not include cess under GST Compensation Act. Thus, SEZ units are not exempted from payment of compensation cess on import of coal.
Explore the Coastal Ceramics vs Union of India case where AP High Court rules that an interest-free refundable security deposit for project completion is not subject to income tax for AY 2019-20.
Andhra Pradesh High Court rejects Yogesh Gupta’s bail plea in AP TIDCO scam case. Full text of judgment and analysis. Learn about the legal implications.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that an unsigned order cannot be covered under – any mistake, defect or omission therein as used in Section 160. Concluded that unsigned order is no order in the eyes of law.
Andra Pradesh High Court dismissed the writ petition preferred against show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 as the petitioner is required to approach the authority which has issued the notice and file the necessary objections with evidence.
Andhra Pradesh High Court allows a writ petition and condones the delay in filing a GST appeal, offering relief to the petitioner.
Explore the AP High Court’s judgment on Sakthi Steel Industries vs. Appellate Commissioner, analyzing GST registration cancellation based on premises sharing
Explore the Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment on New Morning Star Travels vs. Deputy Commissioner (ST). Analysis of GST assessment order implications.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the complainant miserably failed to prove the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 against the respondent/accused beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal dismissed.
