ITAT, Delhi held that the subsidy received by the assessee from the subsidy received under the West Bengal Incentive Scheme of 2004 was capital in nature and could not be taxed as revenue receipts.
ACIT Vs Thatavarthi Ramesh Babu Kanuru (ITAT Visakhapatnam) It is no doubt true that the initial burden is upon the assessee to prove the correct value of the stock held by the assessee and he has to prove that the value reflected in the books of accounts is correct but the fact remains that the […]
Mondal Construction Co. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) We note that assessee had debited a sum of Rs.10,99,907/-in the profit & loss account on account of discount on sale of flat. However, the Assessing Officer disallowed the said discount stating that some of the parties to whom the discount had been given, had informed that […]
ACIT Vs Smt. Champa Nandi (ITAT Kolkata) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Kolkata has held that the finance charges to Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) are not subject to Tax Deduction at Source ( TDS ) under the provisions of section 194A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee has debited in his […]
Assessee come out with the plea that they were not provided with opportunity of cross-examining the witness, the investigation report was not furnished and proper opportunity was not provided of being heard. However we find that all these arguments raised by the assessee before us was never alleged before the AO when the matter was before them.
Milestone Gears Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) For the purpose of calculating deduction u/s 80IC, profit of each undertaking should be treated separately and losses from other eligible undertaking should be ignored. Profit and losses of all the eligible undertaking couldn’t be netted off. Facts –- Assessee is engaged in the manufacturing of automotive […]
ACIT (IT) Vs Shri Ayan Majumdar (ITAT Kolkata) It is not in dispute that the assessee is a non-resident in India and is a tax resident of UK during the year under consideration. It is not in dispute that his employment is exercised in UK. We find that the ld AO had denied the relief […]
Assessment under section 153A could not be made for making addition of unexplained income if assessment was unabated which had attained finality on the date of search and no incriminating material was found as per record.
Once receipt of share capital had been accepted as genuine within the ken of section 68 there was no reason for AO to doubt share premium component received from the very same shareholders as bogus in view of the fact that assessee had duly discharged burden cast on it to prove genuineness of transaction and identity and creditworthiness of share subscribers.
EPRSS Prepaid Recharge Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Tribunal further observed that there was no amendment in the DTAA between the two countries analogous to the Explanation 5 to section 9(1) of the Act and accordingly Amazon was not chargeable to tax in respect of Web hosting charges received from the assessee […]
