Sponsored
    Follow Us:

All ITAT

No adjustment if impact of outstanding receivable considered in Working Capital

August 20, 2019 3003 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Barco Electronic Systems (P.) Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Facts of the Case ♣ Barco Electronic Systems Pvt. Ltd. ( taxpayer) is engaged in business of manufacturing of projectors and parts, trading in visual display products and provision of software development services. ♣ During the year under consideration, the taxpayer entered into various international […]

Payments to teachers/ lecturers/ staff is covered u/s 192 and not u/s 194J

August 19, 2019 11865 Views 0 comment Print

Principal Sri Sathya Sai College for Women Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Assessee college has issued appointment letters to teachers/ lecturers/ staff members from time to time to whom salary was paid. The monthwise salary sheet was also prepared by the college on the basis of the attendance register of the employees. The salary was paid […]

Bogus Share Capital | Addition upheld | Creditworthiness of shareholders not proved

August 19, 2019 1866 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Royal Rich Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) We are of the considered view that the onus is on the assessee company to bring on record the cogent evidences to prove the identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction which in the instant case the assessee is not […]

Section 45(3) AO cannot disturb value of consideration recorded in books of firm

August 19, 2019 7866 Views 0 comment Print

Provision of section 45(3) are exhaustive and does not confer any power on the AO to adopt consideration different from what is recorded in the books of account of the firm. Thus, AO was not correct in adopting the market value of land as revalued subsequently by the firm in the books of account.

Ex-Gratia Payment to prematurely retiring despite absence of Scheme allowable

August 19, 2019 8988 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Prathamik Shikshak Sahakari Bank Ltd. (ITAT Pune) Brief facts relating to the issue are that the Assessing Officer was of the view that in the absence of any scheme formulated by the assessee bank, the amount paid as ex-gratia to prematurely retiring employees was not to be allowed as deduction. The case of […]

Mere disallowance of expense cannot result into concealment of income

August 18, 2019 2088 Views 0 comment Print

Alfa Bhoj Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) With respect to the claim of the deduction of deferred revenue expenditure of Rs. 2950195/– the assessee submitted that the above expenditure has been incurred by the assessee for exploring the future business opportunities. The learned AO disallowed the above sum u/s 37 of the income tax act […]

Penalty should not be imposed for Inadvertent and Bonafide Error

August 17, 2019 3240 Views 0 comment Print

Rasai Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Admittedly, there has been an omission on the part of the assessee to disclose the LTCG on sale of the shops in its return of income for the year under consideration. However, at the same time, we cannot remain oblivious of the bonafides of the assessee, which […]

Growing of hybrid seeds is Agricultural Activity

August 17, 2019 1860 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Genuine Seeds Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Pune) The CIT(A) while deciding the issue in the present case had in turn, relied on the decision of Pune Bench of Tribunal in ACIT Vs. Ajeet Seeds Ltd. (supra), which has been confirmed by the Hon’ble High Court. Consequently, we hold that growing of hybrid seeds in […]

Section 54B does not specify that entire land should be used for cultivation

August 15, 2019 1335 Views 0 comment Print

Rajendra Bastimal Chordiya Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The issue in the present ground is with respect to the denial of claim of deduction u/s 54B of the Act for the reason that the land was not cultivable. We find that the reason for denying the claim of deduction u/s 54B of the Act was for […]

Section 54F exemption if Sale Proceed not invested in Specified Govt Scheme but Property purchased within Three Years

August 15, 2019 1986 Views 0 comment Print

Sh. Vijay Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Whether the assessee invests the entire sales consideration in construction of a residential house within three years from the date of transfer can he be denied exemption under Section 54F on the ground that he did not deposit the said amount in capital gains account scheme before the […]

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031