The issue under consideration is whether the services, the modeling, rendered by Ms. Katrina Kaif in this case constitutes professional service and the fee paid to her for modeling with the purpose of marketing of the camera products of the assessee liable for TDS u/s 194J?
The issue under consideration is that whether the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer on account of assessee’s claim for deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of interest received amounting to Rs.11,10,810/- and other income amounting to Rs. 6,36,746/- is correct or not?
The assessee challenged the jurisdiction as the Assessing Officer has not given any separate satisfaction for the assessee and only a mechanical satisfaction was recorded.
In the given case the appeal is filed by the assessee society because their application for registration under section 12AA is rejected by the CIT with the reason that the society is a commercial entity engaged in providing medical services on commercial lines and levying huge fee for the same, without any act of charity.
Word assessable has been inserted in section 50C w.e.f. 01/10/2009. Thus, prior to 01/10/2009, the section 50C was applicable over the sale of properties, which were sold by of the registered deed where the stamp value was assessed by the registration authorities and the section 50C was not applicable,
Smt. Subbalakshmi Kurada Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The issue under consideration is that if the assessee reinvested capital gains in purchase of new residential house in the name of assessee and his son together then whether assessee in entitle to the full amount of exemption u/s 54? As per Section 54, it mandates that the […]
CBDT’s instruction No.10/2017 dated 15.11.2017 has clearly laid down that only when receipts are completely omitted to be declared in the return of income can there be an addition for invoking 143(1)(a)(vi) of the Act.
Fastway Transmission (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Conclusion: Set top boxes was the property of CISCO which was taken by assessee on lease from CISCO against payment of lease charges thus assessee was not entitled to claim the principal component of alleged lease rent paid as ‘revenue expenditure’ u/s 37(1) however, entitled to claim […]
ITAT Mumbai rules compensation for reduced partnership share is not capital gains. Anik Industries Ltd. vs. DCIT case. Assessment Years 2010-11 & 2012-13.
Assessing Officer tinkered the book profit by adding the additional revenue on account of subsequent realization of export, while computing the book profit u/s 115JB of the Act. The assessee has revised the return of income by including the additional revenue in its total income.
