Vishan Swaroop Gupta Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Credit in the ‘bank account’ of an assessee cannot be construed as a credit in the ‘books’ of the assessee as per section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961. We observe that credit in the ‘bank account’ of an assessee cannot be construed as a credit in the […]
ITAT Bangalore ruling on jewellery dispute. Assessing gold bullion, jewellery values. Assessee vs DCIT case details. Read the full judgment.
Nadeem Mohd. Abdul Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) On a literal reading of Clause (a) of sub-section 1A to Section 2 we find that it refers to any rent or revenue (emphasis supplied by me) derived from land which is situated in India and is used for agricultural purposes. This section does not specify that the […]
ITO Vs Anjli Foundations (ITAT Chennai) The undisputed fact in this case is that the assessee is owner of the land. Therefore, for claiming the deduction u/s. 80IB(10), the assessee has to establish that it had undertaken developmental activities which include activities like undertaking the levelling the road and removal of rock surface in the […]
Bharat Elevators & Engineers Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) There are two limbs in Section 56(2)(viib) of the Act. As per explanation to Section 56(2)(viib) of the Act, the first limb is valuation to be made as per the prescribed method. In fact, the method for valuation of shares is prescribed under Rule 11UA […]
Since there was no allegation by AO on failure on the part of assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment, therefore, reopening of assessment was not based on sound footing and hence the impugned assessment order framed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 was illegal and liable to be quashed.
Om Prakash Karnani Vs. ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) Undisputedly, the cash amounting to Rs. 5,34,000/- seized from the possession of Sh. Nand Lal Joshi and Sh. Nand Lal Pandya belongs to the assessee. The limited question therefore is source of such cash found and seized from the possession of these two persons which belongs to the […]
Disallowance u/s 14A got restricted to the extent of exempt income, even if the provisions of the section 14A were attracted.
Supermax Personal Care Private Ltd Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The facts on record clearly reveal that in Assessment Year 2012-13 the assessee had purchased new plant and machinery on which additional depreciation @20% is allowable. However, since the plant and machinery were put to use for a period of less than 180 days in Assessment […]
Deloitte Haskins & Sells Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: Amount of tax deducted at source from the payment made to the recipient of such income could be said to be the amount of expenditure incurred by assessee and paid during the year and, therefore, it was allowable to assessee as business expenditure. Held: AO did […]
