We are compelled to hold that the benefit received by the assessee in the form of bigger size of flat and amount received as hardship allowance from the developer is a capital receipt, which cannot be treated as revenue receipt for taxing as income.
ITO (TDS) Vs Tata Teleservices Limited (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that the sale of recharge voucher coupons and starter kits and the discount offered to the distributors would not attract TDS provisions u/s 194H of the Act and as such no default U/s 201(1) of the Act can be attributed to the assessee. Sole issue […]
JMW India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) If receipt was not in the nature of income it could not be included in the book profits for the purpose of computation u/s 115JB. Therefore, the interest and the power subsidies received by the assessee under the Government schemes would have to be excluded while computing […]
North Eastern Carrying Corporation Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that assessee was not liable for deduction of tax at source on the bank guarantee fee/commission during the relevant period in absence of any principal agent relationship between the assessee and the bank. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI This appeal by […]
Dr Swati Mahesh Vinchurkar Vs DCIT (ITAT Surat) No addition of amount shown in form 26 AS for taxation If assessee is not the actual beneficiary such amount In Dr Swati Mahesh Vinchurkar v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore [ IT APPEAL No. 43 (SRT) OF 2021 dated June 28, 2021], Dr Swati Mahesh Vinchurkar […]
ITO Vs Sanjay Gurudasmal Chawla (ITAT Mumbai) Assessing Officer rejected the claim of the assessee for deduction u/s. 24(b) of the Act for the reason that the assessee claimed such deduction only by way of revised computation in the course of the assessment proceedings. However, this claim of the assessee was entertained by the Ld.CIT(A). […]
Dhanyata Enterprises Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) A.O. in the instant case disallowed expenses of Rs. 9,94,872/- on the ground that assessee has not carried-out any business activity and no business income has been declared and the assessee failed to produce the complete books of account, bills and vouchers etc. I find the Ld. CIT(A) upheld […]
ACIT Vs Conwood Medipharma Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) CIT(A) noted that the assessee had not claimed the said professional expenses in its profit & loss account and had capitalized the same under work in progress i.e. ‘Building under Construction’ in fixed assets schedule. The CIT(A) thus deleted the addition. We find merit in the order […]
Smt. Manorama Singhal Vs ITO (ITAT Indore) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Indore bench has held that the denial of opportunity to the assessee to conduct cross-examination of the parties who have stated to have received ‘on money from the sale of land would amount to a violation of natural justice principles. The Tribunal […]
DCIT Vs Surbhit Impex Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) It is undisputed position that as on the relevant point of time, the proceedings against the assessee for recovery of these amounts were pending before the Hon’ble judicial forums. It was only on 29.01.2018, i.e., which much after the end of the relevant previous year, that Their […]
