JCIT (OSD) Vs Adrus Estate and Properties LLP (ITAT Pune) It is an undisputed fact that the land was recorded in the books of account as part of investment. It is settled position that the treatment given in the books of account gives an indication as to the intention of the assessee to hold asset […]
Evolutis India Private Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Enlargement of the scope of MCI regulation to the pharmaceutical companies or other health sector industry by the CBDT is de hors any enabling provision either under the Income Tax Act or under the Indian Medical Council Regulations. In our considered view, though the CBDT can tone down […]
State Bank of Patiala Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar) Admittedly the issue pertaining to exemption of I.K. Gujral Punjab Technical University Jalandhar, it is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Nonetheless the certificate was issued by the chartered accountant of I.K. Gujral Punjab Technical University Jalandhar, certifying that the assessee is […]
It was held that transfer of shares of a company to a firm or a company, instead of an individual or an HUF, without consideration or at a price lower than the fair market value does not attract Section 56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act.
Held that search was carried out before the amendment, the addition ought to have been made in terms of the prevailing provision. Therefore, the addition made by the AO invoking Section 115BBE provision of which came into force only on 01.04.2017 is not sustainable.
Sanctuary Television Pvt. Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) The PCIT holds that in this case administrative expenses were in the nature of pre-operative expenditure which could not be set-off against the assessee’s foregoing interest income. And that the Assessing Officer’s action allowing the assessee’s claim in a very casual and mechanical manner deserves to be […]
Hon’ble Tribunal uphold the observations of Ld. CIT(A) wherein it was observed that in order to assess the asset/bank account held by a third party in the hands of the respondent assessee the department has to prove that the assessee has direct beneficial interest in the asset/bank account held by third party.
Parexel International Clinical Research Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) In this case, the assessee coordinated between the individual investigator and Paraxel International GmbH Germany. The contention of the assessee is that assessee has not undertaken any risk and all risk was taken over by Paraxel International GmbH Germany and relied on the Addendum dated […]
ITAT, Bengaluru Bench in the case of Smt. Nethravathi, Bengaluru vs ITO in ITA No.2630/Bang/2017 order dated 25.04.2018 wherein this Tribunal took the view that multiple flats obtained under JDA would be entitled to deduction under section 54F of the Act.
Sanjay Agrawal Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur) – Rejection of books, arbitrary income estimation, and legal principles – AY 2012-13.
