Sponsored
    Follow Us:

All ITAT

Project specific Consultancy & Architect Fees not amount to FTS

October 11, 2021 1956 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Forum Homes Pvt Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) A reading of Article 12(4) of the tax treaty would make it clear that payment made to a resident of one of the contracting state can be regarded as FTS, if, in course of providing managerial/technical or consultancy services, technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes is […]

Comparables with turnover less than Rs. 200 Cr cannot be compared with comparables having turnover more than Rs. 200 Cr.

October 11, 2021 2925 Views 0 comment Print

Galax E Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT held that companies having turnover more than 200 crores upto 500 crores has to be regarded as one category and those companies cannot be regarded as comparables with companies having turnover of less than 200 crores. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT BANGALORE […]

No Disallowance u/s 14A for interest if non-interest-bearing funds exceeds investments in tax-free securities

October 11, 2021 2841 Views 0 comment Print

Disallowance could not be made on interest for earning exempt income under section 14A as assessee had available, non-interest-bearing funds larger than the investments made in tax- free securities.

Amendment in section 43B & 36 cannot be applied retrospectively

October 11, 2021 1971 Views 0 comment Print

Jana Urban Services For Transformation Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The ld.DR contention is that as per sec.43B(b) of the Income-tax Act and explanatory notes to Finance Act 1983, that Employees’ Contribution was never intended to be covered by sec.43B. This has been reiterated and reinforced through Explanation 5 to sec.43B and Explanation 2 […]

Companies with turnover of less than Rs. 200 crores cannot be compared with companies having turnover exceeding Rs. 200 crores

October 11, 2021 3486 Views 0 comment Print

Biesse Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) We have noticed that the turnover of the assessee company for software development segment was Rs. 4.56 crores and hence the assessee company falls in the category of companies having turnover of Rs. 1 to 200 crores. The coordinate bench in the case of Autodesk India […]

Expenses on CSR for AY 2014-15, cannot be disallowed

October 11, 2021 1662 Views 0 comment Print

National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Delhi) In the instant case before us also, the expenses have been incurred on the direction of the relevant Ministry / Government of India. Further, neither the Assessing Officer nor the learned DR has rebutted the contention of the assessee that expenses have been incurred for […]

CIT(A) not justified in not considering TRC submitted during Assessment proceedings

October 10, 2021 1227 Views 0 comment Print

Haresh C Sheth Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) There were justifiable reasons for the assessee in not filing the TRC in the course of the assessment proceedings. But then, we cannot also remain oblivious of the fact that the A.O had declined to apply the special rate of tax as per the DTAA, for the reason, […]

TPO bound by decision of Jurisdictional HC if same has not been suspended or stayed

October 10, 2021 780 Views 0 comment Print

Ikea Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The TPO has not accepted the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court of Delhi in the case of Li & Fund [supra] solely on the ground that an appeal has been recommended before the Hon’ble Apex Court. In our considered view, when the operation of […]

Leave encashment allowable on actual payment basis & not on accrual basis

October 10, 2021 2487 Views 0 comment Print

TV Today Network Ltd. Vs Addl. CIT(A) (ITAT Delhi) Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Exide Industries (Supra) held that the claim with regard to leave encashment has to be allowed on cash basis i.e. actual payment basis and not on accrual basis. It is pertinent to note that the payments with regards to the […]

For Section 80M deduction only actual expenditure incurred has to be taken into consideration

October 10, 2021 1803 Views 0 comment Print

The law is now well settled that for the purpose of deduction u/s.80M of the Act, only actual expenditure incurred has to be taken into consideration and there cannot be any estimate of expenditure that could be made thereon.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031