Amendment brought by Finance Act, 2021 to section 36(1)(via) and 43B is only prospective in nature and not retrospective and the same to be effective from 1-4-2021 and will apply for and from the assessment year 2021-22 onwards.
DCIT Vs Lotus Logistics & Developers Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) In this case ITAT was hearing the dispute related to addition for unexplained cash credit received in the form of share capital under section 68. ITAT observed that on the same issue in a large number of decisions of the coordinate benches held that once all […]
DCIT Vs Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) The only dispute in this appeal is with regard to the addition of Rs.328,69,90,916/-, on account of non-inclusion of “surcharge accrued/levied on electricity bills yet not realized during the year” in the assessee’s total income. ITAT held that There is no dispute over the fact […]
ITO Vs Kirit Raojibhai Patel (ITAT Mumbai) Sale of transferable development rights did not attract capital gains tax since the cost of acquisition for the same did not exist. Held: AO held that transferable development rights (TDRs) arising out of an existing land was an immovable property, the transfer of such TDRs amounted to transfer […]
Prism Networks Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The Hon’ble Tribunal held that the DRP has not considered the plea of assessee in proper perspective. The fact that the TPO rejected the TP Study of the Assessee cannot be the basis not to consider the claim of the Assessee for inclusion of comparable companies. The […]
In the absence of a statutory provision the duty cannot be cast upon legal representative to intimate factum of death of assessee to department and thus, where AO issued a notice to the assessee under Section 148 of the Act after his death and in such a case it could not have been validly served upon the assessee the said notice being invalid is required to be quashed
ACIT Vs Viacom 18 Media Pvt. ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee has made payment for transponder service fees to three entities namely (1) intelsat Corporation, USA, (2) Intelsat global sales and marketing, UK and (3) MEAST satellite system, Malaysia. Assessee applied for an order u/s 195 (2) for Nil withholding tax certificates for payment of […]
DCIT Vs PVP Ventures Ltd (ITAT Chennai) It is to be noted here that the assessee is already into the real estate business through its subsidiaries and also has taken over and merged an entity BREAD who owns a large chunk of land in an extent of Ac.70. Such a large project takes time to […]
Unique Estates Development Co. Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) INCOME FROM UNSOLD FLATS SHALL BE TREATED AS BUSINESS INCOME OF THE DEVELOPER AND NO INCOME FROM HOUSE PROPERTY ON THE BASIS OF ANNUAL LETTING VALUE OR NOTIONAL VALUE OF RENT. FACT OF THE CASE 1. the assessee company is engaged in the business of development […]
Shree Sudhakar Pandey Vs ACIT (ITAT Allahabad) No separate deduction like depreciation will be allowed when the net profit is made on estimate basis after the rejection of books of accounts. ITAT held that held that no separate claim of depreciation is allowable in case of estimation of net profit of the assessee then the […]
