Lambda Therapeutic Research Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) We find that the assessee has not demonstrated any benefit derived from its associated enterprises namely Lambda USA whereas it has advanced interest free loan of EURO 49,999/-. Thus, the question arises whether there is a need to make any adjustment on account of notional interest under […]
Smt. Nalini Anilbhai Amin Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) The proceedings, in the instant case, under section 147 of the Act were initiated by the AO on account of escapement of income of the capital gain generated on the sale of the property. This fact can be verified from the reasons recorded by the AO for […]
Explore ITAT Kolkata’s ruling in Anju Chamaria vs ITO regarding 271B penalty. Analysis of turnover, audit requirement, and key legal insights provided.
If property is used as stock-in-trade, then it would become and partake character of stock and any income derived from stock would be ‘income from business’ and not ‘income from house prperty.
Pranav Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) We have carefully considered the rival submissions made by both the sides and perused the material on record. The issue in the present appeal is with respect to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961. In the present appeal, the show cause notice dated 27.11.2017 […]
Assessee had not explained expenses incurred for earning agricultural income, Assessing Officer was to be directed to make a disallowance to extent of 25 per cent of expenditure on account of earning of agricultural income and pass an order accordingly
Rajesh Sajjanraj Bafna Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Income Tax Proceedings based on documents found by DGCEI during search not sustainable if CESTAT treat such document as DUMB documents At this stage, it is also imperative to remind that the proceedings under the service tax and the income tax are distinct and independent to each other. […]
ACIT Vs Shri M.K. Ajat Shatru (ITAT Delhi) It has been contended by the revenue that the Ld. CIT(A) erred in law in admitting additional evidence by way of certificate from the Divisional Commissioner without giving any opportunity to the AO. He submitted that it would be seen from the revenues record itself, i.e. from […]
nce the assessee has initially deposited TDS and furnished Statement in Form 26QB within time, but committed a technical error while depositing TDS resulting in non-grant of TDS to transferor, compelling it to again deposit TDS along-with interest for late deposit, then, in the interests of justice and considering the fact that no loss is caused to the Revenue, the assessee cannot be saddled with levy of late filing fee u/s 234E
Infosys Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: The applicable rate of TDS on subcontracting charges paid to Infosys China should be considered at 10% as per the India-China DTAA instead of 20% as per section 206AA. Held: Assessee was an Indian company, engaged in the business of development and export of computer software and related […]
